For many centuries the medical benefits of the cannabis plant were widely known and rarely debated.
International cannabis prohibition is built on the unfounded political opinion that cannabis lacks medical benefits and is highly addictive. Science does not back up that opinion.
A United Nations Commission had the chance recently to vote to update current international cannabis policies that are based on harmful prohibition, however, the commission decided to delay the vote.
World Health Organization Recommendation
Last year the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended that cannabis be rescheduled at the international level. Rescheduling cannabis would make it easier to research, among other benefits.
The United Nations Commission on Narcotic Drugs previously had a chance to vote on adopting the WHO recommendation but decided to delay the vote.
The commission was expected to take up the vote this month, however, it decided to punt the vote yet again, this time delaying the vote until December 2020.
Just because the commission earmarked a vote in December 2020 doesn’t mean that the vote will automatically take place. It’s quite possible that the commission could decide to delay the vote for a third time.
In the meantime, international cannabis policies will remain disconnected from reality, and the international cannabis industry will continue to move forward regardless.
It’s Time For A More Sensible Approach To International Cannabis Policy
Whether international cannabis regulators want to admit it or not, cannabis is going mainstream. Countries are no longer waiting for international cannabis policy to be updated before moving forward with their own reforms.
Two countries have already legalized cannabis for adult use (Canada and Uruguay) and two more countries have seen recent landmark court decisions determine that cannabis prohibition is unconstitutional (Mexico and Italy).
A laundry list of countries now permit medical cannabis in some form, with many of those countries exploring adult-use cannabis legalization.
The current ‘head in the sand’ approach by international regulators is a terrible approach to public policy.
The benefits of cannabis need to be properly researched and harnessed and any issues that may arise from cannabis use, such as impaired driving, need to also be properly researched so that sufficient mitigation strategies can be created and implemented.
International cannabis policy needs to be driven by science and logic and not on the outdated political views of a handful of international regulators and leaders.