Close up on a lab testing procedure

Lab Shopping in the Cannabis Industry: A Call for Transparency and Integrity

The rapidly growing cannabis industry faces a significant challenge in lab shopping, which undermines the integrity of its products. 

Lab shopping, the practice of seeking out testing labs that provide favorable results rather than accurate ones, undermines consumer trust and product safety—exploring the implications of lab shopping, its prevalence, the economic pressures driving it, and comprehensive solutions to enhance transparency and integrity in cannabis testing.

Why is Lab Shopping Problematic in Cannabis?

Lab shopping presents multiple problems for the cannabis industry. Primarily, it compromises the integrity and reliability of cannabis testing. Producers might seek out labs that report inflated THC levels or overlook contaminants, misleading consumers and regulatory bodies about the quality and safety of the products. 

This practice not only jeopardizes consumer health but also distorts market competition, leaving those companies that adhere to rigorous testing standards at a disadvantage. 

Those engaging in lab shopping often do so for two main reasons: THC inflation and avoiding the detection of contaminants. 

Higher THC levels are often confused by consumers for a better-quality product and command higher prices. Others may look to avoid the detection of contaminants like pesticides, heavy metals, mold, or Aspergillus, which can endanger consumer health. 

Regulatory bodies and industry watchdogs are increasingly aware of these practices and are working to tighten oversight and improve the reliability of cannabis testing.

How Regulatory Bodies Can Help Mitigate Lab Shopping

Labs found to be engaging in unethical practices face severe consequences. 

Regulatory bodies can revoke their accreditation, effectively shutting down their operations. Legal repercussions can also be imposed, including fines and potential criminal charges. 

Furthermore, the reputational damage from being caught in lab shopping can be devastating, leading to a loss of clients, market share, and industry trust. 

For instance, in 2024, Rapid Analytics, a major testing lab in Mississippi, had its license revoked after an investigation revealed significant deviations from regulatory standards. 

Similarly, in 2019, Sequoia Analytical Labs in California faced severe repercussions when it was discovered that their lab director falsified pesticide test results for hundreds of batches. Sequoia eventually surrendered its cannabis testing license for 2018. 

Regulatory bodies establish and enforce strict testing standards, conduct regular audits and inspections, and take enforcement actions against non-compliant labs, which is essential for maintaining the credibility of cannabis testing and ensuring consumer safety. Regulatory bodies also require labs to participate in proficiency testing programs, where labs analyze standardized samples to demonstrate their accuracy and reliability. Transparent reporting and public databases may also be employed. 

Several cases have involved lab shopping directly impacting consumers, eroding brand loyalty and trust. When a product is discovered to have been falsely labeled or contains contaminants, it can lead to product recalls and negative publicity. 

The revocation of Rapid Analytics’ license and the falsified test results from Sequoia Analytical Labs not only affected the labs themselves but also the brands that relied on their services, leading to a loss of market share and brand loyalty. 

The Economics of Lab Shopping and its Potential Solutions

Economic pressures are a significant factor driving producers to lab shop. The high cost of cultivation and regulatory compliance, coupled with the competitive market environment, make the loss of a crop due to failed lab tests financially devastating. 

However, producers can employ alternative strategies to mitigate economic pressures, such as advanced photonic decontamination technology during the post-harvest process. This innovative method utilizes high-intensity photon irradiation, known as a “photonic storm,” to neutralize harmful microorganisms without leaving chemical residues. 

The technology uses X-ray light tuned to specific wavelengths that penetrate the cell walls of bacteria, viruses, fungi, and even some spores, destroying them at the DNA level. 

One key benefit of photonic decontamination is its non-reliance on heat or moisture, which can degrade the quality of cannabis flowers. Unlike traditional decontamination methods that might alter the chemical structure of cannabinoids and terpenes, this method preserves the natural integrity and potency of these vital cannabis compounds. 

The result is a product that meets rigorous safety standards and retains its original appearance, flavor, aroma, and therapeutic effects.

The photonic approach to decontamination is quick and effective, allowing for the processing of large volumes of cannabis in a short period of time. The investment and adoption of such technology can bolster a brand’s dedication to safety and quality, enhance consumer trust and satisfaction, and help pioneer innovative technologies for product handling and standardization as the nascent industry matures.

Photo by CDC on Unsplash

Author

  • Dustin Hughes has thirteen years in the cannabis industry with extensive experience in building out cultivation facilities and extraction labs. For over five-plus years, he has been a member of the Rad Source Technology team focusing on microbial decontamination using X-rays.

Related posts

Leave a Reply

SEARCH OUR SITE​

Search

GET THE LATEST ISSUE IN YOUR INBOX​

SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER NOW!​

* indicates required

 

We hate spam too. You'll get great content and exclusive offers. Nothing more.

TOP POSTS THIS WEEK​

Cannabis & Tech Today - SOCIAL MEDIA